FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
The line that reads; IPTABLES_MODULES="ip_conntrack_netbios_ns" ;is the line responsible for the 'Loading additional ip tables modules: ip_conntrack_netbios_n FAILD' issue. Edit the line to read; # IPTABLES_MODULES="ip_conntrack_netbios_ns" ;and the issue is no more.
You might want to use the chkconfig command again and turn of the apm daemon;
/sbin/chkconfig --level 345 apmd off
The development kernel is found in the Fedora Development site, here is a link to the development sile;
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
Install the two packages at the same time;
rpm -Uvh nash-6.0.6-1*.rpm mkinitrd-6.0.6-1*.rpm
Then the kernel;
rpm -ivh kernel*.rpm
Notice the difference in the two commands, the first updates the two packages the second installs the new kernel leaving the current kernel(s) installed so you can choose which kernel to use at boot time.
I got the development kernel installed. Should I boot into it and check the speed of the drives again? Also, I tried playing a file from the command line (cache 1000) and it played and had the same problem. This was the output:
Code:
MPEG-PS file format detected.
VIDEO: MPEG1 320x240 (aspect 12) 29.970 fps 2536.8 kbps (317.1 kbyte/s)
==========================================================================
Opening video decoder: [mpegpes] MPEG 1/2 Video passthrough
VDec: vo config request - 320 x 240 (preferred colorspace: Mpeg PES)
Could not find matching colorspace - retrying with -vf scale...
Opening video filter: [scale]
The selected video_out device is incompatible with this codec.
Try adding the scale filter, e.g. -vf spp,scale instead of -vf spp.
VDecoder init failed :(
Opening video decoder: [libmpeg2] MPEG 1/2 Video decoder libmpeg2-v0.4.0b
Selected video codec: [mpeg12] vfm: libmpeg2 (MPEG-1 or 2 (libmpeg2))
==========================================================================
==========================================================================
Opening audio decoder: [mp3lib] MPEG layer-2, layer-3
AUDIO: 44100 Hz, 2 ch, s16le, 256.0 kbit/18.14% (ratio: 32000->176400)
Selected audio codec: [mp3] afm: mp3lib (mp3lib MPEG layer-2, layer-3)
==========================================================================
AO: [alsa] 48000Hz 2ch s16le (2 bytes per sample)
Starting playback...
VDec: vo config request - 320 x 240 (preferred colorspace: Planar YV12)
VDec: using Planar YV12 as output csp (no 0)
Movie-Aspect is 1.19:1 - prescaling to correct movie aspect.
VO: [xv] 320x240 => 320x270 Planar YV12
Message from syslogd@localhost at Fri Jan 12 00:22:40 2007 ...
localhost kernel: Disabling IRQ #5
A: 18.1 V: 17.9 A-V: 0.258 ct: 0.044 534/534 17% 0% 2.4% 50 0 46%
************************************************
**** Your system is too SLOW to play this! ****
************************************************
Possible reasons, problems, workarounds:
- Most common: broken/buggy _audio_ driver
- Try -ao sdl or use the OSS emulation of ALSA.
- Experiment with different values for -autosync, 30 is a good start.
- Slow video output
- Try a different -vo driver (-vo help for a list) or try -framedrop!
- Slow CPU
- Don't try to play a big DVD/DivX on a slow CPU! Try some of the lavdopts,
e.g. -vfm ffmpeg -lavdopts lowres=1:fast:skiploopfilter=all.
- Broken file
- Try various combinations of -nobps -ni -forceidx -mc 0.
- Slow media (NFS/SMB mounts, DVD, VCD etc)
- Try -cache 8192.
- Are you using -cache to play a non-interleaved AVI file?
- Try -nocache.
Read DOCS/HTML/en/video.html for tuning/speedup tips.
If none of this helps you, read DOCS/HTML/en/bugreports.html.
VDec: vo config request - 320 x 240 (preferred colorspace: Planar YV12)%
VDec: using Planar YV12 as output csp (no 0)
Movie-Aspect is 1.19:1 - prescaling to correct movie aspect.
VO: [xv] 320x240 => 320x270 Planar YV12
VDec: vo config request - 320 x 240 (preferred colorspace: Planar YV12)44%
VDec: using Planar YV12 as output csp (no 0)
Movie-Aspect is 1.19:1 - prescaling to correct movie aspect.
VO: [xv] 320x240 => 320x270 Planar YV12
A: 28.7 V: 28.8 A-V: -0.072 ct: 0.365 2349/2349 9% 1% 2.4% 255 0 0%
alsa-lib: pcm_hw.c:600:(snd_pcm_hw_drain) SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_DRAIN failed: Input/output error
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
Start mplayer and adjust your settings for both the Audio and Video;
Menu-->Multimedia-->Mplayer
Right click on the main display window for MPlayer and choose Preferences
Since you have and nVidia card (and hopefully re-setup for the new kernel) try setting the Video to gl or gl2 the audio should be set to alsa or arts, but oss may work if OSS emulation is enabled in the kernel;
Do you want me to boot into the new kernel and try this? Also, I have to set up nvidia still. And it said that my computer is too slow to play this video. Is my computer that slow? Its not that old. Here was my output on the oss check:
[rosatimr@localhost ~]$ /bin/cat /proc/modules | grep oss
snd_seq_oss 39936 0 - Live 0xf09a5000
snd_seq_midi_event 12416 1 snd_seq_oss, Live 0xf0948000
snd_seq 62576 5 snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi_event, Live 0xf097c000
snd_pcm_oss 50848 0 - Live 0xf096e000
snd_mixer_oss 21760 1 snd_pcm_oss, Live 0xf0941000
snd_pcm 87172 3 snd_via82xx,snd_ac97_codec,snd_pcm_oss, Live 0xf0957000
snd_seq_device 13196 4 snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq,snd_rawmidi, Live 0xf08a8000
snd 61060 13 snd_via82xx,snd_ac97_codec,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_timer,snd_mpu40 1_uart,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq_device, Live 0xf0995000
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
Yes use the new kernel and yes you have to re-install the nvidia graphices driver (everytime you install a new kernel BTW). Sorry I cannot answer your question as I do not know your system's cpu speed and throughput.
Using the new kernel check/post;
cat /proc/cpuinfo
hdparm -tT /dev/sda
Also run glxgears (open a xterm session and type; /usr/bin/glxgears) and report your frames per second, example below;
$ glxgears
2068 frames in 5.1 seconds = 404.141 FPS
2280 frames in 5.1 seconds = 449.026 FPS
2280 frames in 5.1 seconds = 445.319 FPS
While this is somewhat slow it is more then enough for mplayer, if less then a 120 FPS or so, then this could be the problem. To end glxgears press the key combo of Ctrl+c
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
The CPU speed is OK, the frame rates are somewhat slow. What about your drive speed??
(assuming the new kernel); hdparm -tT /dev/sda
You might want to upgrade the graphics interface if possible, you don't need the latest and greatest card but something that at leasts doubles the frame rates would be nice. My laptop has a cheap SiS graphics interface which is around 4x faster then your current one.
So if I update my graphics card, will that stop my computer from freezing when I play the videos? Right now it still freezes when I use xine player, but it doesn't freeze anymore when I use mplayer.
When I use mplayer, the computer doesn't freeze but it still disables my wireless card (IRQ #5). Is there a way to prevent that from happening? Also I was just browsing for graphics cards and wanted to ask your opinion. When it comes to electronics I am usually the type not to hold back, and I usually buy a top notch product, cause I know how fast stuff gets outdated. But, in this case, this computer is going to be a secondary computer. I know I will buy/build a computer in the near future. Therefore, I would like to purchase a middle of the road graphics card. Do you have any recommendations? What about this one:
Should I consider one with a TV tuner, or is that unimportant?
BTW, I just want to thank you again for helping me with all this. It is a learning process for me and you have really helped me learn some things. Much appreciated.
I bought a new graphics card. It is installed and I got nvidia installed and everything is working. The only problem, which was my problem from the begining, is that when I watch or download a video, even on youtube for example, my wireless card gets disabled. If the terminal is open, I will here a beep and it will output a line that says, "disabling IRQ #5"
Is there anything I can do? Or is it my wireless card?
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
What is sharing IRQ 5 on your system??? Is it still same as your post #27 in this thread??
It is important that either the IRQ (5) is not shared with the D-Link DWL-G120 wireless USB adapter in use or that the irqbalance service is running on smp systems;
Not good;
# /sbin/service irqbalance status
irqbalance is stopped
Good;
# /sbin/service irqbalance status
irqbalance is running
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.