FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Been having a lot of long random hangs lately, I assume one of the recent updates started it as it was working fine a couple weeks ago. Only seen it happen when playing Minecraft, the `Client thread [20534]` from the logs is the java 1.8.0 process, but it is running most of the time when I use the computer.
But I am not exactly sure where to start. I googled the error and their is a bunch of similar discussion over at https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/ about similar/identical errors. But they want me to compile their bleeding edge tip branch to file a bug report I sort of assume it might just make more sense to try different released i915 versions, maybe all I need to do is upgrade or downgrade 1 version to fix.
But their website does not really contain much information. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Do I just need to lookup how to regress or update the linux kernel on fedora, or can I change the intel graphics drivers and stay on the same kernel?
You might find it easier to use F36, which is already running the 5.17.2 kernel, and due for release this month. If that isn't helpful, try installing the 5.18 rawhide kernel.
Thanks mrmazda. I ran the upgrade will see if I still encounter any problems.
Not sure if I should start a new thread on this, but following their upgrade guide, I am a little confused by the cleanup steps.
autoremove gets me:
Code:
================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
================================================================================
Removing:
NetworkManager-initscripts-ifcfg-rh
x86_64 1:1.36.4-1.fc36 @fedora 311 k
NetworkManager-initscripts-updown
noarch 1:1.36.4-1.fc36 @fedora 2.1 k
bluez-obexd x86_64 5.64-1.fc36 @fedora 622 k
botan2 x86_64 2.19.1-1.fc36 @fedora 5.9 M
colord-gtk x86_64 0.3.0-1.fc36 @fedora 74 k
dbusmenu-qt x86_64 0.9.3-0.28.20160218.fc36 @fedora 205 k
f35-backgrounds-base noarch 35.0.1-3.fc36 @fedora 20 M
f35-backgrounds-gnome noarch 35.0.1-3.fc36 @fedora 925
f35-backgrounds-kde noarch 35.0.1-3.fc36 @fedora 2.8 k
gtk2-immodule-xim x86_64 2.24.33-8.fc36 @fedora 40 k
ibus-qt x86_64 1.3.3-33.fc36 @fedora 442 k
intel-gmmlib x86_64 22.1.2-1.fc36 @fedora 543 k
intel-media-driver x86_64 22.3.1-1.fc36.2 @rpmfusion-nonfree 31 M
iptables-legacy-libs x86_64 1.8.7-15.fc36 @fedora 91 k
java-11-openjdk-headless
x86_64 1:11.0.14.1.1-5.fc36 @fedora 177 M
java-latest-openjdk-headless
x86_64 1:18.0.0.0.37-2.rolling.fc36
@fedora 195 M
libfreeaptx x86_64 0.1.1-3.fc36 @rpmfusion-free 54 k
libpmemobj x86_64 1.11.1-4.fc36 @fedora 379 k
libsss_autofs x86_64 2.6.3-1.fc36 @fedora 62 k
libva-intel-driver x86_64 2.4.1-8.fc36 @rpmfusion-free 7.9 M
libyui-qt x86_64 4.2.16-3.fc36 @fedora 1.1 M
libyui-qt-graph x86_64 4.2.16-3.fc36 @fedora 153 k
lilv x86_64 0.24.12-4.fc36 @fedora 102 k
llvm-libs x86_64 14.0.0-1.fc36 @fedora 104 M
lv2 x86_64 1.18.2-2.fc36 @fedora 399 k
minizip x86_64 3.0.2-6.fc36 @fedora 168 k
minizip-compat x86_64 1.2.11-31.fc36 @fedora 55 k
mozjs78 x86_64 78.15.0-3.fc36 @fedora 28 M
neon x86_64 0.32.2-4.fc36 @fedora 331 k
openssl1.1 x86_64 1:1.1.1n-1.fc36 @fedora 3.7 M
pakchois x86_64 0.4-25.fc36 @fedora 29 k
pipewire-codec-aptx x86_64 0.3.49-1.fc36 @rpmfusion-free 45 k
podman-gvproxy x86_64 3:4.0.2-1.fc36 @fedora 11 M
podman-plugins x86_64 3:4.0.2-1.fc36 @fedora 3.2 M
qt x86_64 1:4.8.7-67.fc36 @fedora 18 M
qt-at-spi x86_64 0.3.1-22.fc35 @fedora 345 k
qt-common noarch 1:4.8.7-67.fc36 @fedora 0
qt-x11 x86_64 1:4.8.7-67.fc36 @fedora 37 M
radvd x86_64 2.19-5.fc36 @fedora 170 k
sni-qt x86_64 0.2.7-0.10.20170217.fc36 @fedora 142 k
The java ones are probably understandable as Minecraft does not require any specific Java version, so they are not listed as hard dependencies, even tho I want to keep them. But how do I tell about some of these other ones? A lot of these drivers and codexs, and network managers seem like something I would not want to uninstall unless I was absolutely sure about it. But I have no idea were to start looking to verify if I indeed dont need them???
I don't know what to tell you about "cleanups". When I run dnf system-upgrade, I use --allowerasing. This hasn't been leaving me any cleaning up to do. As long as everything in a cleanup list is .fc36 and not .fc35, there's probably no good reason to remove any, unless storage space on / is an issue for you.
You might find it easier to use F36, which is already running the 5.17.2 kernel, and due for release this month. If that isn't helpful, try installing the 5.18 rawhide kernel.
Hmm, getting the same issue on both F36 kernel and installed a older one. The error stays the same and talks about the version 62 firmware `GuC firmware i915/tgl_guc_62.0.0.bin` I will have to see about finding a kernel with a different version or building my own. For installeding Rawhide like you mentioned, that woudl just be `DNF install ./kernel-*`??? But how would you tell which files you need? Looking at my system it seems semi random. like 5.17.0-300 comes with headers while 5.17.0-200 does not.
When it comes to building software of any kind, I can't help. At this point I'd try to get help from Intel's driver writers via their mailing list. Your Alder Lake CPU was launched less than 6 months ago, so probably hasn't had all the FOSS bugs worked out yet.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
