LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora
User Name
Password
Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-19-2004, 07:16 PM   #16
VxJasonxV
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Mesa, AZ
Distribution: RH9, LFS5, Knoppix 3.2/3.3 (Live), FC1, FC2, MDK10CE, MDK10OE, Gentoo
Posts: 51

Rep: Reputation: 15

The GPG-KEY import issue should be placed in here as well.
 
Old 03-11-2004, 08:15 AM   #17
sgtbob
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Kansas
Distribution: Windows 7, iMAC Lion 8.5, Ubuntu
Posts: 92

Rep: Reputation: 15
Lightbulb CD Player

dfsh... -Do you suppose the XMMS site you show would work on WS 3? I've tried RH 8, RH 9, WS 2.1 and now WS 3 and none of them will play a CD. Sound board is OK, I even reloaded XP to see if the board was good and it was. Since hardware works under XP, I have to believe it is the software, or lack thereof. I DL an XMMS rpm last evening, but that didn't do it either. Any suggestions?
 
Old 03-15-2004, 01:48 PM   #18
Bomb187
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: 15
Nevermind, i fix it.

Last edited by Bomb187; 03-17-2004 at 06:25 PM.
 
Old 04-13-2004, 06:07 PM   #19
LordMorgul
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Ca
Distribution: Fedora, RH 7.1-9.0
Posts: 68

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by drunkenPenguin
Hi,

you may also want to use the rpms.testing repository at rpm.livna.org for updating your nvidia drivers.

Daniel
For those unaware, the reasons this is a good idea include:
-- no issues having the nVIDIA driver coexist with Mesa-libGL
-- startup scripts to verify the module exists before attempting to run X using the module
-- handy script to enable / disable the nVIDIA module without editing XF86Config by hand
 
Old 04-15-2004, 02:59 PM   #20
Bomb187
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: 15
http://rpm.livna.org/fedora/1/i386/R...n.2.1.i386.rpm
the link to the mp3 support for fedora doesn't work, can we get a new link to it??
 
Old 04-15-2004, 06:04 PM   #21
LordMorgul
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Ca
Distribution: Fedora, RH 7.1-9.0
Posts: 68

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by Bomb187

the link to the mp3 support for fedora doesn't work, can we get a new link to it??
The livna.org repo is offline for the timebeing, there was a server failure. It will return when possible, and they are reportedly looking for mirrors to help.

ftp://ftp.uninett.no/pub/linux/Fedor.../rpm.livna.org

xmms-mp3-1.2.8-0.lvn.2.1.i386.rpm
xmms-mp3-1.2.10-0.lvn.1.1.i386.rpm

Looks like this ftp is the only mirror (this information was taken from following forum post), here is an example of how to use it: http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/sho...&threadid=1370

Last edited by LordMorgul; 04-15-2004 at 07:29 PM.
 
Old 04-16-2004, 12:58 PM   #22
Bomb187
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: 15
thanks alot! Good info.
 
Old 05-12-2004, 09:41 PM   #23
gnu noob
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: CA
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 146

Rep: Reputation: 16
Here's some really good info on installing flash, Java, and Real Player

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...t=Fedora+Flash
 
Old 06-01-2004, 03:00 AM   #24
BittaBrotha
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
Distribution: Debian Sid, SourceMage 0.9.5, & To be Continued on a TP
Posts: 800

Rep: Reputation: 31
I didn't see anything about the 3com nic issue! Am I overlooking it?

Quote:
3com Nic Issues
If you are having problem with your 3com nic then here is a link for that as well.
http://fedora.artoo.net/faq/#3c905
 
Old 06-11-2004, 01:35 PM   #25
ipn1nj4
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: Fedora Core 1/2
Posts: 27

Rep: Reputation: 15
A lot of users are having problems installing UT2004 in Fedora. My post at the bottom of

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...hreadid=182057

explains an easy way that I have found to do so. It works very well.
 
Old 09-29-2004, 06:13 AM   #26
ronss
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: phoenix,az
Distribution: red hat linux enterprise-centos
Posts: 766

Rep: Reputation: 31
Angry

its too bad red hat did away with the desktop version. their last good distro was 7.3, had most of the muti-media stuff too. wish red hat would come out with a true desktop version , and do like suse, charge for it. be better than the fedora thing if you ask me
 
Old 09-29-2004, 09:17 PM   #27
LordMorgul
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Ca
Distribution: Fedora, RH 7.1-9.0
Posts: 68

Rep: Reputation: 15
I strongly disagree with that assumption. The Fedora community's involvement has been making constant improvement to Fedora possible. The bugzilla is very active, and the additional community rpm packagers and repositories are growing the available software that can be installed in Fedora painlessly. RH never had a more stable and bugfree distribution prior to merging with the Fedora project, but the distribution was hogtied and constrained, whereas now there are a few more bugs showing up.. but they are fixed very quickly. I consider that higher quality.

As for multimedia, it is all at rpm.livna.org so in the distro 'proper' or not it is all there and ready for use.

Last edited by LordMorgul; 09-29-2004 at 09:20 PM.
 
Old 09-30-2004, 05:50 AM   #28
ronss
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: phoenix,az
Distribution: red hat linux enterprise-centos
Posts: 766

Rep: Reputation: 31
lord morgal

thanks for the insight, great personal observation on fedora. well, i might just install it in a couple of days when i get my processor, and see whats going on with it. have suse 9.1 on one of my rigs, and its working fairly good. curiosity has got me, and will give it another try. later
 
Old 09-30-2004, 03:31 PM   #29
LordMorgul
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Ca
Distribution: Fedora, RH 7.1-9.0
Posts: 68

Rep: Reputation: 15
If you do (or anyone else reading decides to take a look) poke around FedoraFAQ.org, FedoraForum.org, and FedoraNEWS.org for a little while beforehand. The helpful docs there will make the install and configuring the alternate software repos much simpler.

And although I did just evangelize a touch I do recognize Fedora isn't for everyone.. my LUG has just decided we will be pimping Suse at our free install session this college quarter (called Free Your Machine), and I'm not too sad about that decision. ;-) Last time we went with Mandrake 9.2 and I was sad about that one! Use what works best.

One of Fedora's major selling points is the Gnome default desktop and all gtk based configuration tools. The overall polish of the desktop environment is quite good for both Gnome and KDE, in fact you can switch back and forth and a casual observer wouldn't know you did (mostly from the bluecurve theme).
FC3t2 supports (with some minor tweakage) the XComposite extension for Xorg, and although it is still buggy and needs alot of work for desktop integration it does produce beautiful effects... so the FC3 release will bring some really stunning changes including Gnome 2.8 and xfce4. Fedora is being compiled with optimizations for i686 as well so the gap narrows between Gentoo performance and binary distros.
(here is my desktop showing off some translucent windows)

http://www.andrewfarris.com/images/g...-04_173823.jpg

btw I love your sig.. but another option to buying a distro package is directly supporting projects you see needing help, or those guys who are making the 'big' changes in Linux.

Last edited by LordMorgul; 09-30-2004 at 03:35 PM.
 
Old 12-07-2004, 08:40 AM   #30
Belghouth
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Tunisia
Distribution: Redhat (Now Fedora), Mandrake, Suse, Debian.
Posts: 65

Rep: Reputation: 15
try this also www.linuxforums.org

Last edited by Belghouth; 12-31-2004 at 01:32 AM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fedora Core 64 Bit Guide leon85 Fedora 1 08-14-2005 05:01 PM
Fedora Core 64Bit Guide leon85 General 2 08-12-2005 01:14 PM
RHCE Trouble Shooting Files Nilesh.Shah Linux - Newbie 6 06-12-2005 07:38 AM
Rhce trouble shooting binumvk Linux - Certification 3 06-23-2004 12:51 PM
Trouble launching apache on yarrow (fedora core 1) rinne Linux - Software 2 05-29-2004 10:02 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration