FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
have Fedora Core 4 installed been long time since I have installed a red hat setup. see not much has changed except I cant seem to find rpm's as easily. should setup the apt-rpm stuff.
Note 1: kde-redhat depends on extras repo (comes with your FC4) and the livna repo, if you don't have livna installed do a
Code:
rpm -ivh http://rpm.livna.org/livna-release4.rpm
at your favorite terminal.
Note 2: Doing a general update on kde* can be a bad idea, I remember some issues regarding yum doing more than 32 (times 2 if updating) operations at once (dunno if they fixed this yet). So try going one step at a time, like first updating kdebase & kdelibs then go for kdemultimedia (this will be big) and kdepim (another big one), proceed with kdesdk & kdevelop and then I think it should be safe to update the remaining.
I know Fedora just released their own version of KDE 3.5 - The problem is that everybody knows (or at least everybody should know) that official Fedora packages for KDE are usually crippled and makes it look bad when it comes to stability and functionality.
not sure what I installed know I am missing kpackage and other programs which kinda ticks me off. it would be nice if they had packages to install what they removed.
used to slackware.
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by mebrelith
I know Fedora just released their own version of KDE 3.5 - The problem is that everybody knows (or at least everybody should know) that official Fedora packages for KDE are usually crippled and makes it look bad when it comes to stability and functionality.
And the other does not release source rpm files and does not support anything other then x86 which makes me wonder about stability, functionality and security. I'm not saying they are bad but they should at least make available the source rpms for review IMHO.
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by mebrelith
To Lenard:
Want source? Get THE source
They built binary rpms, they should supply the source rpms.
If you don't think so, then this is OK. But for me, if they cannot supply the source they used to build the binaries, I do not want the binaries. And yes this is a personal thing and not a complaint.
If you know of location where these sources are available, then please post.
At least the Fedora folks supply the source for review/modification;
To Lenard:
As far as I know the folks at kde-redhat do no modification but the ones the folks at KDE do, thats why I said that if you need the code (the source rpms) you might as well get the code from KDE.
To mrapathy:
Weird, so is it just the menu entry missing or is it the kpackage thingie not available even at run box?
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by mebrelith
To Lenard:
As far as I know the folks at kde-redhat do no modification but the ones the folks at KDE do, thats why I said that if you need the code (the source rpms) you might as well get the code from KDE.
Actually, they take the source code from Red Hat / Fedora
make changes and re-publish the source (yes, I found the source rpms);
%changelog
* Sat Dec 17 2005 Rex Dieter 6:3.5.0-2.2
- put %%_libdir/lib*.a only in -devel
* Fri Dec 16 2005 Rex Dieter 6:3.5.0-2.1
- -devel: Req: openssl-devel (#175940)
* Tue Dec 13 2005 Than Ngo <than@redhat.com> 6:3.5.0-2
- apply patch to fix konqueror for working with new openssl #174541
But they make it a bit strange to build working binary rpms. I understand about using other third party repos and apps, but really;
# rpmbuild -bb kdebase.spec
error: Failed build dependencies:
kdelibs-devel >= 6:3.5.0 is needed by kdebase-3.5.0-1.2.x86_64
mDNSResponder-devel is needed by kdebase-3.5.0-1.2.x86_64
In order to build the kdebase you need to build and install kdelibs first and maybe making your system fairly un-stable(??) is not a good idea. Don't take this as a complaint either, it is just a comment. The source rpms as supplied by Fedora Core do not build properly in an x86_64 CentOS-4.2 system either. Looks like I have some work to do in either case to build a set of KDE-3.5 binary rpms for x86_64 (as I expected).
Off to see if I can build a good set of the qt (3.3.5-7.1) binary rpms for x86_64.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.