DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Oh pay no attention to that. It said the same thing for my sources.list entries when I installed woody from cdrom. If I remember correctly, there was a note on the Debian website basically saying that whoever created the iso images forgot to change the title of the cds from "unstable" to "stable". You should be fine as long as it's set up for files to be downloaded from the stable branch.
Looking at my sources.list (now that it's in front of me):
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official powerpc Binary-7 (20030109)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official powerpc Binary-6 (20030109)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official powerpc Binary-5 (20030109)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official powerpc Binary-4 (20030109)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official powerpc Binary-3 (20030109)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official powerpc Binary-2 (20030109)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official powerpc Binary-1 (20030109)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
it doesn't seem that 'unstable' is being listed as part of that long CD name, does it?
Anyhow, maybe things will make more sense once I set up sources.list for pulling current (stable) stuff off the net.
Any idea about the missing /etc/apt/apt.conf file? All I've got there (besides my sources.list) is an /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/70debconf file which contains only:
// Pre-configure all packages with debconf before they are installed.
// If you don't like it, comment it out.
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs {"/usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true";};
Originally posted by Strike A somewhat inaccurate, but quick and dirty way of checking what distribution you're running would be to cat /etc/debian_version.
Forgive me if this sounds silly , but why is cat /etc/debian_version
a "inaccurate" & "dirty" way to determine the current version?
Originally posted by Strike A somewhat inaccurate, but quick and dirty way of checking what distribution you're running would be to cat /etc/debian_version.
Originally posted by AXO Forgive me if this sounds silly , but why is cat /etc/debian_version
a "inaccurate" & "dirty" way to determine the current version?
I'm not a sys admin , just a humble home user ,who's trying to learn as much as possible .
Regards
AXO
Well, first of all, you can modify /etc/debian_version to read "super-duper-latest-and-greatest" but that doesn't make it a Debian branch But also, a more genuine concern is that that really only indicates what version one of the packages is (base-(something), can't remember what), and doesn't tell the true story of your whole system. You CAN mix branches (though don't, unless you really know what you're doing), so you could conceivably have the unstable version of whatever package /etc/debian_version is in (I'm too lazy to run dpkg -S /etc/debian_version to find which package that is), and then every other package on your system could be from stable.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.