ArchThis Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I currently use Fluxbox but I will slowly be trying to wean myself to Openbox when I get around to it. Its just like Windows-Linux conversion I've used Fluxbox ever since I started linux and I can make it jump through hoops via the config files, however I have a beef with the devs and don't know enough C++ to make a fork so WM hunting I be going :/
I use Metacity as part of Gnome. I've tried switching to KDE a few times (and it was what I used when I first started using Linux), and dabbled with using just a basic WM like Fluxbox, but I always keep coming back to Gnome.
If it ever comes close to being finished, I might give e17 another try, but it's still slightly too ragged around the edges for now.
I use fluxbox because it's lickity quick.
It's great once it's set up just the way you like it, but can be a pain to customize it from a vanilla install.
Gnome's pretty nice too.
I use it on my secondary distros where I can't be bothered to configure fluxbox.
antiloaded,
I'm not sure about fluxbox within gnome but I know you can replace metacity wm in gnome with openbox easily. In fact, I have ran openbox inside gnome with no problems in the past. You may be able to do something similar with flux.
Distribution: Debian E, Vectorlinux 5.1std, Arch, Gentoo 2006.0
Posts: 576
Original Poster
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrj
antiloaded,
I'm not sure about fluxbox within gnome but I know you can replace metacity wm in gnome with openbox easily. In fact, I have ran openbox inside gnome with no problems in the past. You may be able to do something similar with flux.
Thanks for your advice. I installed fluxbox inside Gnome, and it seems to run just fine Now I just needs to learn all the new features, and howto make use of them all
Distribution: Debian E, Vectorlinux 5.1std, Arch, Gentoo 2006.0
Posts: 576
Original Poster
Rep:
well I did a reinstall of the basesystem and now i'm running fluxbox & blackbox. It runs smoother on a clean install, and I didn't want such a 'huge' part of the gnome repositories.
I use icewm. I also have ratpoison installed but I almost never use it anymore.
Before that I used xfce,fluxbox,windowmaker,openbox,ion3,wmii (all for more then some weeks or months)but in the end I find icewm best in features and speed.
I never tried icewm before because I found it's look too much remind me of windows, but now I use the SilverXP theme which just looks like windows xp and I don't care.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.