LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Arch
User Name
Password
Arch This Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-15-2003, 10:52 PM   #1
lilsirecho
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: So Cal
Distribution: many
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
"mawk" dependency missing in CD install


Attempting to install arch-0.5...base package selected..install packages selected...pacman initial entry followed by error staement "mawk" dependency not on CD... abort install and connect to this forum

The CD program is automatic such that the user cannot determine what is going on or what to do if error messages appear. An expert in the arch program is needed to answer the question what to do if "mawk" error message is displayed.

Downloaded the CD iso, recorded the CD and re-ran the install with same result when loading packages.

Examination of the CD in windows shows a package for "mawk" as a tar.gz in the CD contents.

Whazzup

Last edited by lilsirecho; 10-18-2003 at 10:09 PM.
 
Old 10-18-2003, 05:03 AM   #2
lilsirecho
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: So Cal
Distribution: many
Posts: 5

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Re-downloaded arch-0.5...attempted to load packages...same result...."mawk" not included in CD October 18, 2003
 
Old 10-21-2003, 02:22 PM   #3
Rico16135
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Texas, USA
Distribution: Slackware 9.1, SuSE 9.1
Posts: 245

Rep: Reputation: 30
same problem here... i was told to try an ftp install, but am currently having problems configuring the proper module for my nic. But maybe you can get past where i can't... try it let me know btw its not just a mawk dependency issue, if you unselect autoconf, which has a dependency to mawk you just get another dependency warning altogether so something is very wrong with their cd.
 
Old 10-21-2003, 02:37 PM   #4
lilsirecho
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: So Cal
Distribution: many
Posts: 5

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Many thanks for response...have since re-tried load of arch using auto-load steps with Lilo boot..get kernel panic with init. missing in kernel. No reason to panic, it's just our policy!!

I love work...I can sit and watch it all day!!!!

What next?
 
Old 10-21-2003, 10:42 PM   #5
ferrix
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Ultima, Blag, KateOS, PCLinuxOS, Frugalware
Posts: 216

Rep: Reputation: 31
Guys, I don't have the answer for you but I'd suggest posting about your problems on the actual arch forums at http://bbs.archlinux.org/
I certainly didn't see any problems with mawk, or anything else for that matter, with my install of 0.5. But I downloaded my version a while back, perhaps there have been some changes in the iso...
 
Old 10-22-2003, 03:38 PM   #6
Rico16135
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Texas, USA
Distribution: Slackware 9.1, SuSE 9.1
Posts: 245

Rep: Reputation: 30
well i visited the arch irc where i didn't get any help. some people tried, but to no avail. said screw it, (and believe me i gave it an ample amount of time) and reinstalled mandrake 9.1, and will wait for 9.2. I guess. I was just shocked to find out my beloved distro was manufactured by the french, and started looking around.. but maybe its not that big of a deal.
 
Old 10-25-2003, 11:22 PM   #7
jlowell
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 0
One known cause of this problem is a user failure to select "DONE" at the bottom of the menu after partitioning and mounting file systems. It's easy to overlook, particularly if your drive has several partitions. You've got to scroll all the way down to the bottom to find it. The documentation available at the distro's website instructs users to take this step. I missed it the first time around and got the mawk message. The installation concludes that the initial steps aren't completed and reacts this way. So don't quit, certainly not for something as bloated as Mandrake. Read the instructions carefully and follow them closely as you install. Good luck!

jlowell

Last edited by jlowell; 10-25-2003 at 11:27 PM.
 
Old 10-26-2003, 01:09 AM   #8
Rico16135
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Texas, USA
Distribution: Slackware 9.1, SuSE 9.1
Posts: 245

Rep: Reputation: 30
ok, in an effort to eliminate my need for Mandrake, I will reformat, and try what you described above. I hope it works, but if it doesn't that's the last time I'm trying Arch. I'll let you know what happens. Thanks for the tip by the way.
 
Old 10-26-2003, 11:14 AM   #9
jlowell
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 0
Rico,

While I'm certainly pleased to learn that its your intention to attempt a reinstallation of Arch, I would hasten to reemphasize the other main point in my post: That the problem here is due, quite possibly, to user error. I would think that you'd owe yourself at least enough of an effort to ensure that that contingency is ruled out whatever your doing so may require. So if you are interested in learning about GNU/Linux at any deeper level than that offered by the Reddrakes and the Manhats - I know I didn't learn very much about Linux from them in the two years I worked with them - I encourage you to persist until you can, in conscience, lay your problem at Arch's doorstep. Do that one for Rico, eh?

jlowell
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0"." zaps Linux - Games 9 05-14-2007 03:07 PM
Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0". fostiator Linux - Hardware 15 02-20-2005 07:13 AM
suse ati driver "Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing" madcow007 Linux - Hardware 0 03-06-2004 02:53 PM
bash-2.05b# Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0". citrus Linux - General 8 02-22-2004 10:43 AM
LFS 4.1: Stalled at Perl, "missing seperator" error from "make" SparceMatrix Linux From Scratch 1 06-07-2003 03:31 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Arch

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration