ArchThis Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
If you use an AUR integrater, some of them have options to handle that. The one I use is Packer, and it manages nicely with 'packer -Syu --auronly --devel'
Which checks for updates to AUR packages only, upgrades them, and re-makes any -git -hg -svn -bzr and so on packages or any others known to use them.
I tried yaourt for a time, but I didn't get along with it as well as I do packer.
I guess when you get down to it though it's a matter of taste really. I don't use packer for installing packages, I still do it the 'old' way, downloading the PKGBUILD and other needed files and running makepkg, then pacman -U, packer's there strictly for updates.
I don't know why but I always run a Syy && Syu at the same time. I don't know why I do this but I recall reading somewhere on the Wiki that it's recommended.
Code:
[carlos@bishop /]$ sudo pacman -Syy && sudo pacman -Syu
Password:
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core 35.5K 139.8K/s 00:00:00 [################################] 100%
extra 460.3K 538.1K/s 00:00:01 [################################] 100%
community 381.3K 429.9K/s 00:00:01 [################################] 100%
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
there is nothing to do
Does anyone know if this is wrong or does it not matter?
I want to upgrade once in a year before the New Year celebration. Why? 'Cause it's kinda cool to get tons of new programs' versions as a present. Am I strange?
It seems unneccessary. Just run pacman -Syyu.
The double y forces getting the databases even if they don't appear to be newer. It's only really needed if you change mirrors, but I guess you could use it all the time.
I don't know why but I always run a Syy && Syu at the same time. I don't know why I do this but I recall reading somewhere on the Wiki that it's recommended.
Code:
[carlos@bishop /]$ sudo pacman -Syy && sudo pacman -Syu
Password:
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core 35.5K 139.8K/s 00:00:00 [################################] 100%
extra 460.3K 538.1K/s 00:00:01 [################################] 100%
community 381.3K 429.9K/s 00:00:01 [################################] 100%
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
there is nothing to do
Does anyone know if this is wrong or does it not matter?
It doesn't matter. It might take longer than necessary, as you update your package list even if it doesn't need it, but it won't break anything by itself.
I upgrade all the time. At least a few times a day. The more you upgrade the easier it is to troubleshoot if something breaks. Also, if you wait TOO long, you could have problems.
I've had to cut back of late actually, due to the internet I'm temporarily using costing me a bit too much. I leave it to once a week, and every other week I run through AUR packages.
On the other hand, aside yet another attempt, and subsequent bad run in with, KDE4.x I've had no breakage at all on my laptop.
I like Arch. Out of all of them, only Slackware comes close to doing all that Arch does.
How frequently does your system break after an upgrade (if ever)?
If your system has broken after an upgrade, what was the issue (xorg crashing, kernel panic, etc...)?
I installed Arch yesterday, ran pacman -Syu right after the install, and it broke then. It upgraded to a 2.3.35 kernel. Turns out that the rt73usb driver that supports my wifi dongle is broken in 2.3.35 kernels.
I ended up building a 2.3.33.4 kernel and an nvidia driver to go with it.
I installed Arch yesterday, ran pacman -Syu right after the install, and it broke then. It upgraded to a 2.3.35 kernel. Turns out that the rt73usb driver that supports my wifi dongle is broken in 2.3.35 kernels.
I ended up building a 2.3.33.4 kernel and an nvidia driver to go with it.
I don't know if this will help, but there's a compat-wireless package which is good for some older nics.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.