Linux Filesystem of the Year
A new category last year that ended up with fairly lopsided results. Based on feedback it may be rotated out next year.
--jeremy |
Went with btrfs here, even though I also use Ext4, I made great experience with btrfs and it supports Snapper backups, which is another plus for me, being on openSUSE.
|
My needs are simple. Voted ext3. But on my non trim supported ssd atom netbook.
I roll with ext2 with no /swap partition. |
Voted ext4, but going to try btrfs one of these days.
|
Everything uses ext4 on my systems. :)
|
why no ext2? it's all i use
|
Quote:
Not noticing any performance increase, but Btrfs appears pretty robust and performing well for like one year now. |
btrfs, because of transparent compression
|
I voted XFS because at work have several NAS over 16 TB
ZFS i great too but RAIDZ is not growable as easy as growing RAID with mdadm tools. |
Missing ReiserFS in the list :-( Its still working fine here...
|
Reiser4 is the most recent release and has been included in the category from the beginning.
--jeremy |
ReiserFS (which is Reiser3) is quite a bit different than Reiser4 isn't it?
|
ext4. Would like to try XFS on my ssds, can't get it to boot through. Probably just me I'm guessing.
|
ext4 for me...maybe I need to try a different one sometime!
|
Formated my HDD with LUKS encrypted Btrfs. Used it for months, since I had not the time to change it, but I never had such a slow system in my life before.
Came back to ext4, which in my search is actually the fastest filesystem nowadays, and became a happy Linux user again! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM. |