LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   2016 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2016-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-123/)
-   -   Linux Filesystem of the Year (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2016-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-123/linux-filesystem-of-the-year-4175596320/)

jeremy 12-28-2016 12:20 PM

Linux Filesystem of the Year
 
A new category last year that ended up with fairly lopsided results. Based on feedback it may be rotated out next year.

--jeremy

bbuske 12-28-2016 12:30 PM

Went with btrfs here, even though I also use Ext4, I made great experience with btrfs and it supports Snapper backups, which is another plus for me, being on openSUSE.

rokytnji 12-28-2016 02:17 PM

My needs are simple. Voted ext3. But on my non trim supported ssd atom netbook.

I roll with ext2 with no /swap partition.

stanvan 12-28-2016 03:04 PM

Voted ext4, but going to try btrfs one of these days.

fatmac 12-31-2016 07:41 AM

Everything uses ext4 on my systems. :)

Keith Hedger 12-31-2016 08:49 AM

why no ext2? it's all i use

bbuske 12-31-2016 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stanvan (Post 5647453)
Voted ext4, but going to try btrfs one of these days.

You should. I am aware of the fact, that it had received some bad reviews in the past, but I had absolutely no problems with it. Basically I decided to give it ago, since I use openSUSE, which comes with Snapper for backups and Snapper requires Btrfs. I have however my /home formatted in Ext4, since I don't need it snapshot.

Not noticing any performance increase, but Btrfs appears pretty robust and performing well for like one year now.

ugjka 12-31-2016 11:47 AM

btrfs, because of transparent compression

trosdejos 01-05-2017 07:14 AM

I voted XFS because at work have several NAS over 16 TB
ZFS i great too but RAIDZ is not growable as easy as growing RAID with mdadm tools.

Fellype 01-05-2017 10:40 AM

Missing ReiserFS in the list :-( Its still working fine here...

jeremy 01-05-2017 10:55 AM

Reiser4 is the most recent release and has been included in the category from the beginning.

--jeremy

SilentSam 01-05-2017 01:36 PM

ReiserFS (which is Reiser3) is quite a bit different than Reiser4 isn't it?

weirdwolf 01-12-2017 08:36 AM

ext4. Would like to try XFS on my ssds, can't get it to boot through. Probably just me I'm guessing.

FredGSanford 01-12-2017 04:18 PM

ext4 for me...maybe I need to try a different one sometime!

teresaejunior 01-13-2017 09:34 AM

Formated my HDD with LUKS encrypted Btrfs. Used it for months, since I had not the time to change it, but I never had such a slow system in my life before.

Came back to ext4, which in my search is actually the fastest filesystem nowadays, and became a happy Linux user again!

lewnidas_ 01-19-2017 01:29 PM

ext4 and for me all the time...

whitshade 01-19-2017 05:10 PM

Voted for ext4 as it's served me well, but ReiserFS has a spot in my heart from my Slack days.

User9 02-02-2017 03:34 PM

BtrFS, create/delete subvols on a live system, Snapshots that don't take up any or little space ...Bootable Snapshots ? Combined with mirroring or striped mirrors and a NAS Backup plan, When (If ?) it ever becomes stable it will be Priceless.

Pyrotech72 02-02-2017 05:11 PM

still ext4 all the way, and will be for the foreseeable future

d_K 02-06-2017 05:03 PM

ext3 because I hate waiting 15 minutes after the file manager finishes transferring files to my usb drive on ext4...but the drive is still active after the file manager claims it's done transferring files.

slackist 02-06-2017 05:42 PM

ext4 here as well. It does its job well enough for my needs.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 PM.