Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have done that - and the "sane-backends-1.0.9.tar.gz" install appears to have gone OK. Now "sane-find-scanner" finds the scanner, but "scanimage -L" can not find it. I have tried installing "plustek_sane-0_44_10.tar.gz" (to include support for the CanoScan N650u) but this does not seem to be successful. Looking at "/usr/local/etc/sane.d" the N630u is listed, but there is no reference to N650u.
Thats because the N650u uses the plustek.conf file, not the cannon630u.conf file. You'll need to open /usr/local/etc/sane.d/plustek.conf and edit it for a usb scanner.
I modified /usr/local/etc/sane.d/plustek.conf and looks like this:
# For parport devices use the parport section
#[parport]
#device /dev/pt_drv
# leave the default values as specified in /etc/modules.conf
# option warmup -1
# option lOffOnEnd -1
# option lampOff -1
#
# The USB section:
# each device needs at least two lines:
# - [usb] vendor-ID and product-ID
# - device devicename
# - CanoScan N650u
[usb] 0x04a9 0x2206
device /dev/usb/scanner
Again "sane-find-scanner" finds the scanner, but "scanimage -L" doesn't.
adding "options scanner vendor=0x04a9 product=2206"to the end of /etc/modules.conf made no difference. And I still have to manually do "modprobe scanner vendor=0x04a9 product=2206" before "sane-find-scanner" can see the scanner.
When I removed the sane-1.0..8 rpm, I had to remove xsane and libsane. Searching for libsane.so.1 on RPMfind it lists "sane-backends-1.0.9-1.i386.rpm" (Which is not listed when searching for sane.) Is it safe to install the "sane-backends-1.0.9-1.i386.rpm" over the source install to get libsane, or do I throw the lot out the window?
libsane.so.1 is part of sane-backends so you'll have it installed already, try just doing "modprobe scanner" without the options and post the output of "lsmod".
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.