Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Okay, I'll admit to have at least one too many tonight. But Linux is clearly driving me to it.
I've tried to deal with this for over a week, looking for yt-dip. Only today I realized it's my old eyes and a lousy font. IT's yt-dLp, NOT -dIp.
Good Lord, Linux is going to lose all it's old-time users this way. You've introduced far too many unnecessary changes too quickly. Worse, the changes are unwarranted.
It's understandable to feel frustrated with changes in technology, but blaming Linux for a simple mistake is unfair. It's important to take responsibility for our own mistakes and not attribute them to external factors. Linux is an evolving system, and while some changes may be challenging, they are often necessary for progress. Additionally, it's essential to have an open mind and adapt to new technology, rather than clinging to the past.g
The maintainer has given 20 years of his life to keeping one step ahead of youtube's software guys. How much has he made from it? Have you ever donated? I'd be fed up too.
youtube-dl is a project that has been discontinued for quite some time. It worked for a long time, but if you used it via the command line with a link after the command, the download was usually extremely slow, always below 100 kbps.
What has happened is that the maintainers of most Linux distros have left youtube-dl stuck in the repos, and so most Linux users still don't realize that youtube-dl is a dead project and continue to use it at that extremely low download speed.
The FreeBSD maintainers have solved this problem a bit more thoughtfully by creating a link from youtube-dl to yt-dlp. So all those years of Linux users doing youtube-dl and getting extremely slow downloads, FreeBSD users have been seeing the following happen to this command (for years):
There is one script that works. It's called yt-dlp. You can install it with pip3.
Forks are great when they improve on the original. Libreoffice is superior to openoffice, whose development is stalled. When youtube-dl was taken down over some specious "Copyright infringement," there were half a dozen replicas up within a week. yt-dlp emerged as superior. After 36 posts, give over, convert to yt-dlp and get over it. "The king is dead, long live the (new) king" sort of thing.
If youtube-dl was working today I wouldn't use it because it obeys youtube's download throttling, whereas yt-dlp bypasses it.
Last edited by business_kid; 05-02-2024 at 06:12 AM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.