LFS 7.1 Build: File-5.10 won't compile in step 6.12
Hi guys. Newbie LFS builder here going thru the LFS 7.1 book. I have gone thru all steps prior to the subject one with no problems, but File-5.10 refuses to compile. It fails with the following error:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Thanx for responding, druuna. I checked my activity for 6.10, and all appears to be OK. The entire command sequence as executed is as follows:
Quote:
|
I don't see anything wrong with the above posted sequence....
Just noticed, have a look at this: Quote:
You don't mention having trouble with zlib, but maybe you need to double check that one as well (if you haven't done so already). EDIT: If that doesn't solve anything, can you post the config.log files for both zlib and file? |
Re the command sequence for 6.10, I would like to double-check something. In the step
Quote:
Quote:
Re the build for zlib, I checked the command sequence and it looks OK. It is shown below. Quote:
|
I think I solved the problem. As a followup to running the step
Quote:
Quote:
If this sort of step is required in 6.10, perhaps it should be documented in the book. |
Quote:
There is one thing I like to know before digging any deeper: Have you (partially) automated the build? I'm asking because the output you posted here looks nice and uniform, something a script would produce. |
No automation here. The output was produced by simply scrolling back the terminal output and copying and pasting what I needed. The terminal history limit is set high.
I am building this in a Virtualbox VM using Slackware Current as the host. When I have to shut down I just save the machine state and restore it when I continue. |
Quote:
Can you post the actual config.log files created by zlib and file? |
Quote:
If you think it is worthwhile, I could unpack zlib and file again, run configure for both, and report the resulting logs, but since gcc has now been recompiled the environment has changed and results may not be useful. Re gcc, after the recompile, I reran 'gcc -dumspecs ' and checked the output and there are no longer any occurrances of '/tools' in it, so I could probably clear the CFLAGS variable assuming carrying on is an option. Where should I go from here? |
Quote:
|
I shall do that. Onward and upward :D
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM. |