Server distribution recommendation
Dear LQ-members with diverse Linux experience!
I'm looking for a good server Linux (or UNIX) for my home server. I like the thought of FreeBSD being mainly from one contributor, but because of hardware compatibility and my good knowledge of Linux I'd prefer a Linux. Please help me find a good "alternative" to FreeBSD. What I hope to get:
Not compatible distributions to myself:
My current ideas are basically downstreams of REHL
If you have any further distributions I could use / should try, please tell me, and also let me know, why you think so. |
Quote:
|
Alma would have been one of my recommendations. A member of my LUG, who sysadmins a medium thin-client network in the enterprise, speaks highly of it, and I've had positive experiences with it in a VM.
Another would be Ubuntu Server LTS. Just my two cents. |
@mrmazda
Quote:
@frankbell Thanks for your answer, but please bring up more details about what makes it a good alternative to FreeBSD in your opinion. |
Quote:
There is Alpine which is quite complete yet defaults to a very bare bones setup. Another option would be basic Devuan, which is a Debian derivative stripped of the systemd bloat and liabilities. The more I've been using Alpine in production, the more I have begun to like it, so it's what I would suggest for your short list. It does have a somewhat short support cycle though, but that is less likely to matter at the beginning as you will more likely than not be rebuilding several times as you experiment. Either way, start out with the least possible amount of processes and add in only what you need as you start to need it. |
Quote:
In my experience, it's bulletproof as a server on both physical and virtual machines. |
Quote:
How hard did you try with Debian? I can't remember ever having serious trouble installing it. The only fault I find in its installer is insistence on formatting any swap partition to be included in the installed system. It's necessary to not include existing swap in the installed system until after installation is complete to workaround this behavior. Debians the foundation of many distros, for good reasons, an outstanding distribution for anyone who places a premium on long term support or reliability. |
Typically HP certifies SuSE and RHEL which includes their RAID drivers. Although could depend on model but I have read that others work if you put the controller back in ACHI mode including debian and slackware.
https://wiki.debian.org/HP/ProLiant Alma and Rocky are binary compatible with RHEL and should work out of the box so pick the one you like the best. |
Quote:
For Ubuntu just because it defaults to something doesn't mean you have to do it that way. When I use it I set a root password. I create a wheel group and use that instead of sudo group. I do a bunch of different things that aren't default. With a few exceptions you can run it any way you want, just like any other distro. |
I always recommend the free RHEL recompiles as the best server OS anyway if you don't want to pay for RHEL. Alma seems to have more $$$ support, so they've become my go-to recommendation over Rocky.
|
Quote:
OP also said: Quote:
I'll reiterate that Slackware ticks all of OP's boxes. |
As I posted previously RHEL and SuSE are certified by HP and both include the proprietary RAID drivers whereas slackware does not. The OP does not like SuSE.
At a minimum in order to install other distributions you need to change the BIOS for the RAID controller to ACHI mode. The OP has not mentioned whether hardware RAID is a requirement. I have run CentOS for many many years and it has been very stable. |
Quote:
|
Actually Slackware is out, because it doesn't set one tick:
It's a rolling release system. Quote:
The bricolage setting up "new" admin groups is especially what I do NOT want to do at all. Quote:
I'll also consider the thought for Alma, I think dev $ was meant and not (client/user/enterprise) support. Thanks so far, I'm going to update, after the holidays. Have a nice time and a good new year! Rocky/Alma: I'd use CentOS, if it would still be downstream. |
Quote:
Quote:
The latest stable version is 15.0, which was released in February. There have been regular (weekly/fortnightly) security patches and bug fixes since then, and it will continue to receive support for many years. The previous 3 stable versions (14.2 released on 1-Jul-2016, 14.1 released on 4-Nov-2013 and 14.0 released on 19-Sep-2012) have all received regular security patches and bug fixes their entire lives... the latest all being within the last two weeks. You seem to have made up your mind, so I won't say much more than: Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM. |