Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Perhaps this is a nod to RHEL's success, because honestly, RHEL 5 was released around the same time as Windows Server 2003 R2. The fact that it is still in use is pretty cool.
It also puts me in perspective...I got my RHCE what feels like forever ago, and it was RHEL 6 =)
Edit - Apologies, that should be Windows Server 2003 *Service Pack 2*, not R2.
Posted 03-19-2016 at 05:34 PM byrocket357 Updated 03-19-2016 at 06:06 PM byrocket357
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
